dailymail.co.ukdailymail.co.uk - February 13 view article

Manchester United could make £26m a season by selling off Old Trafford naming rights, according to new study

  • Old Trafford named as most valuable stadium in terms of naming rights
  • Manchester City earn £19m from Etihad and Arsenal £15m from Emirates
  • Chelsea could rake in £18m a year while Tottenham could generate £15.5m 

Manchester United are missing out on more than £26million a season in potential revenue for Old Trafford's naming rights, according to corporate finance advisors Duff & Phelps.

That figure, which is £7m more than Manchester City earn from Etihad's sponsorship of their ground, is contained in a new study of naming rights values in the Premier League.

Duff & Phelps believes the value of this market has risen by 80 percent from £74.6m in 2013 to £135.6m last year, with the league's 'big six' accounting for more than three quarters of that sum.

Manchester United could generate further profit by selling the naming rights to Old Trafford

Old Trafford - £26m

The Etihad - £19m

Stamford Bridge - £18m

Tottenham's new stadium - £15.5m

The Emirates - £15m 

Anfield - £11.1m

All figures are based on per-season 

United, however, have repeatedly said they have no intention of selling the naming rights to their 75,000-capacity home, a stance that has not changed.

The study ranks Chelsea's Stamford Bridge as the third most valuable naming rights deal at nearly £18million a year, with Spurs' new White Hart Lane worth a potential £15.5million to a sponsor - marginally more than Emirates' deal with Arsenal.

Liverpool's Anfield is in sixth place at £11.1m, but this is probably a reflection of the fact the naming rights to famous old grounds are not particularly attractive to sponsors as very few people ever use the new names - a point that could also be made about Old Trafford.

The evidence from North America, where naming-rights deals are common, suggests sponsors are also reluctant to take on a ground that has previously been sponsored by somebody else, as the name tends to linger. This explains why new stadia, whose names have not yet stuck, are worth a premium.

Head of UK sports at Duff & Phelps Trevor Birch acknowledged that these valuations were 'not an exact science' and were 'potential, theoretic valuations that might not be achievable on the market'. 

Arsenal benefit from the fact that the Emirates Stadium has always been known by that name

The valuation of Anfield was reduced because few fans would accept calling it a new name

But the former Liverpool youth player who quit football to train as an accountant and went on to become chief executive at Chelsea, Leeds, Everton, Derby, Sheffield United and Portsmouth, believes the naming rights to 'iconic' grounds, such as Old Trafford, can still attract big sums.

Birch highlighted the example of Real Madrid and the Bernabeu - although that deal, worth a reported £350m with energy multinational Cespa, is now in doubt - and pointed out that eight of the 20 clubs in the Premier League have got naming-rights deals.

'It's an emotive topic, particularly in this country, but it's an area that is definitely under-utilised as a revenue stream,' Birch said.

One Premier League club keen to tap into this market is West Ham, but efforts to secure a naming-rights partner for the London Stadium have been hampered by negative headlines related to its building and running costs. 

Duff & Phelps believes sponsorship for the former Olympic Stadium could be worth almost £5million a season, though.

West Ham have struggled to seal a sponsor for the London Stadium, which is valued at £5m

dailymail.co.ukdailymail.co.uk - February 13 view article