BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) - U.S. officials said Wednesday they'll review the recent lifting of protections for Yellowstone-area grizzly bears in light of a court ruling that retained protections for gray wolves in the Great Lakes.
About 700 bears in and around Yellowstone National Park lost their threatened species status on July 31, opening the door to future trophy hunts in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho.
Just a day later, a federal appeals court in Washington D.C. said in the wolf case that wildlife officials needed to give more consideration to how a species' loss of historical habitat affects its recovery.
FILE - In this Sept. 25, 2013 file photo, a grizzly bear cub forages for food a few miles from the north entrance to Yellowstone National Park in Gardiner, Mont. Researchers say there are an estimated 718 bears in the region, a figure that's little changed from last year as state officials prepare for possible hunts for the animals for the first time in decades. (Alan Rogers /The Casper Star-Tribune via AP, File)
Like wolves, grizzly bears have seen a strong recovery over the past several decades in isolated regions of the U.S., but remain absent from the vast majority of their historical range.
In its response to the appeals court ruling, the Fish and Wildlife Service said it's now seeking public comment on the potential implications for Yellowstone bears.
The animals will stay under state jurisdiction and off the threatened species list while the review is pending, said Fish and Wildlife spokesman Steve Segin. The agency plans to release its conclusions by March 31.
Grizzlies remain protected as a threatened species outside of the Yellowstone region and Alaska.
Other species could be affected by the ruling, Segin said, adding that it likely would have to be under similar circumstances where a decision was being made on just a segment of a species' entire population.
Andrea Santarsiere with the Center for Biological Diversity said Wednesday's announcement was an attempt to paper over what she called "fatal flaws" in the decision to lift protections.
"Yellowstone's grizzly bears remain at risk and no amount of bureaucratic jujitsu by the Trump administration will change that fact," Santarsiere said.
The question in the Great Lakes wolf case was whether some members of an animal population can meet the legal definition of recovered even as the species struggles or is nonexistent elsewhere.
A three-judge panel concluded federal officials erroneously considered the status of the Great Lakes population in a vacuum, leaving wolves elsewhere in the country in "legal limbo" after wolves in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota lost protections. Those protections later were restored by a federal judge.
Yellowstone's bears make up one of the largest populations of grizzlies in the Lower 48. They've been isolated for decades from other concentrations of bruins, including an estimated 1,000 grizzlies in northwest Montana.
Follow Matthew Brown on Twitter at www.twitter.com/matthewbrownap .
FILE - This July 6, 2011 file photo shows a grizzly bear roaming near Beaver Lake in Yellowstone National Park, Wyo. U.S. officials say they will review a recent ruling that lifted federal protections for about 700 bears in the Yellowstone region. (AP Photo/Jim Urquhart, File)
Sorry we are not currently accepting comments on this article.